Congratulations to Tony “Governator” Filippone, HfS’ new Head of Research

“On the road from the City of Skepticism, I had to pass through the Valley of Ambiguity…”

… and what better way to announce an exciting promotion than this quote from capitalism’s founding father, Adam Smith that, well, pretty much sums up how the outsourcing industry needs to evolve beyond its labor arbitrage model.  Yes, at HfS we sure this is what Mr Smith was really referring to when envisioning the wealth of nations over two centuries ago.

People keep asking me what makes HfS different from other analyst firms.  Rather that take you through reams of cheesy PowerPoint to demonstrate our unique ways of developing and actioning data and insight, let’s cut to the chase:  what makes us different is our people.  Essentially, we have a mix of personalities at HfS who come from practitioner, consultative, service provider and analyst firm backgrounds.  We don’t just hire kids and stick them in ivory towers, or professional ivory tower-types who just like sitting in their….er ivory towers.  We focus on the practical, as well as the insightful:

  • If you’re a buyer and you want help with your governance, we think you’d prefer to speak to an analyst advisor who has done just that as a buyer, who constantly talks to many other buyers to explore best practices;
  • If you’re a provider and you want help with your messaging or positioning, we think you’d prefer to talk to an expert who has done just that for a provider and hobnobs with many other providers to explore best practices;
  • If you just want to get into your own ivory tower and pontificate with other ivory tower-dwellers, well, we can do that too (if you like) and have the ppt primed and ready for your scholarly satisfaction.

Our core mantra at HfS has always been to tackle the issues and complexities of global sourcing through the eyes of the buyer.  One analyst who has spent nine years of his life doing just that, leading BPO governance for the $62 Billion healthcare payor, WellPoint, is our Governator himself, Tony Filippone.

Tony Filippone

Tony "The Governator" Filippone, concealing a baseball bat, is HfS' new Executive VP for Research (click for bio)

No single person in 2011 has written to – or talked with –  more buyers about their governance challenges, and we are delighted to reveal to the world today his elevation to Executive Vice President of HfS’ research team.  Tony’s role, is to ensure all our research is communicated to the buyer (and not the puffy stuff only advisors and providers pretend to understand).  He is also tasked with pulling our ongoing data on industry trends and dynamics from our 63,000 network and making it meaningful and actionable to the world.  And his ultimate religious quest is how to figure out, with the rest of the industry, how the hell we can all move on from the labor arbitrage model… so without further ado, I’ll hand you over to Tony, who tweets (click to read on):

@The_Whole_Outsourcing_Industry: Labor arbitrage built your house of cards.  #Bubble  What’s next?


8 Comments

Join us next Friday for some perfect hangover fodder

We’ve teamed with our esteemed industry colleague Ed Caso, Managing Director and Senior Analyst for the IT/BPO Services Equity Research Team at Wells Fargo Securities, to review the world of outsourcing in 2011… and take a peek at what’s in store for 2012:

And while you are shrugging off your office party hangover and trying to avoid recalling what you were doing the night before*, we’ll be deliberating the following topics:

  • How this year’s economic uncertainty impacted sourcing behavior with outsourcing and shared services strategies across IT and business operations
  • How we expect to see 2012 shaping up with outsourcing adoption
  • How the financial mechanics of outsourcing have been impacted by the economic volatility – and what we can expect to see happening in 2012**
  • How Cloud Computing and Business Platforms are expected to impact global sourcing next year
  • Will the rising impact of social communities help buyers and providerhfs-s learn from each other?    

December 16th at 10:00 AM Eastern Time, 3.00pm GMT

REGISTER NOW

*Remember to check the photocopier room to destroy any evidence
**Please be advised that any predictions made during this session will automatically expire on January 7th, 2012

Leave a comment

It may be for life, but will there be innovation, as TCS inks the mother of all insurance BPO deals

For better or for worse, for richer, for poorer, until many missed SLAs do us part.

Imagine committing to someone for 15 years?  Most marriages are long-divorced by that stage, companies rise and fall, entire countries are created, invaded and may even go bankrupt…

So how about standardizing life assurance and pension policies for said period, which is exactly what TCS’ insurance services delivery subsidiary, Diligenta, has become wedded to in a 15-year, $2.2bn, 1900 employee marital partnership with the UK’s Friends Life. This represents the largest life and pensions BPO engagement by a considerable margin, eclipsing the $1.1bn Prudential contract awarded to Capita in 2007.

At HfS, we believe this move from TCS signals a sea-change in the industry with regards to the growth strategies and ambitions of the leading BPO providers.  Simply put, they are no longer keen to acquire each other, and see much more value ingesting large clients with domain and technology value. Taking on new clients, even at low-margins, is simply less risky from an investment perspective, and the value from developing on-shore domain capability and delivery platforms far outweighs absorbing all the unwanted mess you get when you take out competitors.

The BPO Holy Grail is no longer all about scale – it’s also about removing as many manual elements from processes as possible

We’ve been rambling on a lot about Business Platforms of late, and we see this engagement as a genuine move by a provider to develop one that dominates the UK insurance sector.  So let’s keep this simple – the other day I made an electronic payment to one of our suppliers.  Once the payment was completed, I had generously opted to pay the $25 transaction fee at my end for sending an “international payment” (even though it was all made in US dollars).  Still wallowing in the pleasant thoughts about what a nice generous person I was, the next day I received a phone call Read More »

Leave a comment

In case you missed our “Kill the Sales Cheese” webcast, here’s the replay

Leave a comment

SAP + SuccessFactors = Great for SAP, but could restrict growth potential for the HR services industry

"I'll show you how I feel about your license model..."

SAP has made a major move to “Cloudify” its software portfolio with the $3.4bn acquisition of the darling of HR software, SuccessFactors. However, while HfS’ research partner Ray Wang succinctly outlines why this is a winning move for SAP, we do not believe this is particularly good news for BPO service providers and services clients.

This rampant consolidation of business software apps firms makes it tough for service providers to develop their own Business Platform offerings and develop outcome-based delivery models.  As we have been discussing at length on HfS, the leading BPO providers are hurriedly developing service offerings that are underpinned by Business Platforms to support transactional, high-volume, standardized processes with very little variation in outputs.  HR services are prime candidates to be optimized by Business Platform delivery, epitomized by ADP’s GlobalView payroll and HRO offerings – arguably the industry’s first Business Platform – introduced years before anyone even knew what a Business Platform was.

This means BPO providers have three choices with their Business Platform strategies

Choice 1: Develop and patent their own cloud-based workflows

This is surely where BPO service providers can really clean up, provided they can deliver complete clusters of standard process offerings for their clients that are cloud-based, affordable, scalable, high-quality and – most importantly – can be maintained with quality service personnel that can offer consultative support when needed, as the client seeks to transition onto the offerings.  Most BPOs today are developing prototype platforms that they can “productize” as utility services, once they achieve a handful of clients using each offering.  Our ongoing research already points to more than 150 business platforms in various nascent stages of development from the BPO providers. Read More »

21 Comments

Fed up with cheesy sales presentations? Well, here’s the web event you’ve been waiting for…

Fed up with those whiffs of camembert emanating from your latest sales deck illustrating 92 beautifully-crafted graphical representations of your offshore transition methodology, your global delivery model and your “unique” roadmap to achieving innovation? Still wondering why your last three deals went south despite those investments your firm made in PowerPoint designers?

Well, your wait for answers is soon to be over, thanks to our own resident cheese-buster himself, the notorious Esteban Hererra who re-wrote the rule book on busting through the PowerPont cheese with his famous post entitled “Eight top tips to prevent outsourcing providers committing harakiri in the sales process“.

Read More »

Leave a comment

Too late to compete with the Sourcing Raj? (Part I)

Taking on the Indian outsourcers: too late to make a splash?

HfS Research Fellow and Sourcing Change protagonist Deborah Kops investigates whether India has bowled an unplayable delivery to the rest of the world’s ambitious outsourcing businesses, or if there’s still a chance to nick it over the slips and get on the scoreboard…

Let’s give Indian-legacy providers their due—they arguably initiated, then accelerated acceptance of  the concept of working offshore; they’re well-entrenched in some of the best global clients; they’ve set the bar for industrialized delivery—from hiring to training; from process mapping to technology, from delivery to measurement. As a result, sending critical processes over five time zones away is considered safe and smart today. Other countries want to emulate their positioning, ensuring that the names Brazil or Chile, Malaysia or China, South Africa or Kenya, Ukraine or Poland are mentioned in the same breath when global delivery models are under discussion.

Will the market expand rapidly enough to make non-Indian providers a must-add to business models—beyond a language or regional proximity play? Will clients seriously consider providers based in other geos to deliver critical scale for finance and accounting, knowledge or vertical business functions in the near term?

Despite rising costs and increasing attrition rates, it seems, for the foreseeable future, Indian legacy providers will continue to have a leg up on providers headquartered in other countries, with good reason.

Why is challenging for non-Indian offshore providers to penetrate the global outsourcing market?

Reputation. Bad American sitcoms and call center jokes aside, just as Germany has built a reputation for precision engineering, or Italy for fashion, or the French for fine food, today India’s greatest reputational export is globalizing work. It makes no difference that the Koreans can now Read More »

19 Comments

As InfosysBPO reaches the $500m mark, is it ready for the big-time?

One thing’s for sure – we’ve heard a lot of noise from the Indian IT services mammoths over the last five years that they are going to grapple with the likes of Accenture and IBM to become billion-dollar BPO giants.  And while Cognizant, Infosys, TCS and Wipro have all made progress developing sizeable BPO businesses, none of them have yet come close to surpassing the size and scale of pureplay Indian BPO leader, Genpact’s $1.5bn turnover.  Why is this?

The Indian ITOs have built their companies by occupying “real-estate” in the CIO offices of the Global 2000.  They’ve done a phenomenal job piling in the people resources to support application testing, maintenance, help desk and development projects.  They’ve developed institutional knowledge of their clients’ IT processes to support the business, which has proven cost-effective for the vast majority of leading global enterprises.  Our recent state of outsourcing survey found 97% of $1bn enterprises outsourcing some component of their operations in today’s environment, with most of these organizations involving Indian ITO service providers within their supplier portfolio. However…

Developing BPO footprints requires cementing relationships beyond the walls of the CIO’s office. One of the reason’s for HfS’ success, is our ability to communicate with business function leaders, in addition to IT leaders.  This involves understanding and lending value to supporting the business function issues and processes that impact finance, procurement, supply chain, HR and other operational areas.  Most of our research competitors are firmly rooted in IT-land and have not invested in personnel that can open communication channels to support the business functions - and most never will.

It’s similar for the Indian IT services firms, as they seek to push business-process led solutions, often enabled by IT, into their clients.  While many initially began their forays into BPO by attempting to reach business function leaders through their IT relationship, most have realized that they need a more direct line into the business function than tenuous introductions from the VP of CRM apps.  They’ve realized they need to make significant investments in domain-specific personnel (with real process experience) both onshore and offshore, to create awareness and open communication channels, in addition to the scale they need to take on business. They’re also realizing they need patience to convert clients and often start with much smaller engagements and make margin sacrifices.

So let’s take a closer look at one of the up-and-coming Indian firms that’s made a concerted effort to build a top-tier BPO business over recent years: InfosysBPO, who recently invited us, and several other industry influencers, to partake in their anual BPO client event, named “Colloquium 2011“.

Is InfosysBPO ready to challenge for industry leadership?  Here is our thinking… Read More »

8 Comments

Don’t miss today’s web-debate – The Future of BPO

Are you ready for our next installment of HfS’ Live and Unfiltered series, broadcast live infront of the HfS Research community? Well… wait no longer for more no-holds-barred fun, no sponsors, no schmaltz, no selling – just good banter and discussion to share with our industry peers and colleagues.  Amd this time we’ll be debating the very “Future of BPO”…

 

Here’s the line-up… Read More »

1 Comment

Capgemini collects Vengroff Williams to slip into third spot for global Finance & Accounting BPO

With the paranoia of an impending Double-Dip Recession seemingly forever looming over us, what better than to help your clients get their bills paid?

With competition in Finance and Accounting Business Process Outsourcing (F&A BPO) reaching cut-throat levels (just observe some recent down-select negotiations and you’ll know what I’m talking about), what better than to acquire one of the most attractive onshore order-to-cash (OTC) specialists?  With demand for comprehensive F&A BPO coming from both mid-sized, in addition to enterprise-level clients, what better than to acquire an OTC specialist with on-the-ground delivery expertise and a mid-market offering?

Our only surprise at HfS is that is took so long for one of the top tier BPOs to make this move – acquiring the 45-year old heritage accounts receivables and order-to-cash specialist, Vengroff Williams and Associates.  A provider steeped in blue-chip clients at the enterprise level, such as Disney, General Electric, News Corp, Microsoft and Tyco, in addition to a raft of mid-sized clients such as Elizabeth Arden, U-Haul, Crescent Healthcare and Office Depot.  A provider that has resisted the temptation to develop offshore delivery and focus on smart onshore services. A provider that has developed its own excellent SaaS proprietary order-to-cash technology platform, WebCollect.  A provider with an annual client get-together called the “Billion Dollar Forum”, that you just have to go to, as its the closest thing you’ll ever get to feeling like a billionaire…

Yes, Capgemini has made a major move towards strengthening its position in the global F&A BPO market by today acquiring VWA – and leaping to third in the market share spot for F&A globally (which may change when we re-cast our data early next year, but for now they’re on podium).  You can also read more about our 2011 F&A BPO market landscape and outlook by clicking here.

We believe VWA was one of the few remaining jewels that the major BPOs needed to take a serious look at to bolster their presence and capabilities in order-to-cash.  Here is what they are adding to Capgemini’s global BPO business: Read More »

8 Comments

What are Business Platforms and why they represent the future of outsourcing

We’ve been talking about Platform BPO, Cloud BPO and every other permutation of BPO for a very, very long time.  So what’s changed, we hear you cry

Buyers are ready to standardize business processes

"Please mind the innovation gap"... click here to find out what Business Platforms are and why they represent the future of outsourcing

Our recent study that covered the intentions and observations of 534 buyers, advisors and providers with their sourcing strategies, in the event of this seemly ever-present threat of a “Double-Dip” Recession, revealed what is motivating buyers to outsource in this current climate.

While eliminating cost is an ever-present obligation, buyers are also equally focused on achieving greater flexibility to scale and support their global operations – and even more significantly – prepared to explore adopting standardized business processes.

Yes:  80% of buyers are willing to move onto standard processes.  They are increasingly unconcerned if their closest competitors use the same expense management or claims adjudication processes, the same cash applications or collections tools.  They simply want to adopt quality process flows they can deploy effectively and efficiently, if there is no competitive advantage to be gained that necessitates conducting these processes in a certain unique manner:

 

Providers have a real incentive to position productized and one-to-many (or at least one-to-few) utility offerings onto buyers

The ability to develop some best-in-class processes as “Business Platforms”, whether they focus on horizontal or vertical process clusters, is becoming a real differentiator in the market, as buyers Read More »

12 Comments

The three tenets of Global Business Services execution: customer alignment, accountability, and economies of scale

How do you execute for Global Business Services? Click to find our more...

The complex sourcing options available to global operations leaders today can prescribe real opportunities for business improvement, but  can also pose intricate challenges.  As we’ve been at pains to point out on HfS over the years, outsourcing is only one vehicle to provoke change, impact cost and provide process improvement opportunities. 90% of enterprises, with over $1bn in annual revenues, have shared services operations, and these need to be aligned more effectively with the 97% of these organizations grappling with governing outsourcing relationships.

So how do you take shared services leaders and blend their expertise with the outsourcing governors? How do you go from fragmented service delivery with multiple points of contact, to a global governance model with a rationalized and centralized administration of third-party service providers?

In our first paper on the topic, The Evolution of Global Business Services: Enhancing the Benefits of Shared Services and Outsourcing, we asserted that senior leaders can leverage a Global Business Services strategy as a comprehensive approach to achieve strategic objectives through blended shared services and outsourcing solutions.  In our new report, which we have co-written with Charlie Aird and Derek Sappenfield of PwC and entitled The three tenets of Global Business Services execution: customer alignment, accountability, and economies of scale, we are sharing best practices from organizations that have successfully implemented a Global Business Services strategy.  In particular, these include:

»      Focusing on the Customer – Global Business Services’ processes and technologies enable business unit strategies.  Building alignment and sharing a vision is imperative to achieving successful results.

»      Building the Service Delivery Model – Achieving economies of scale and scope requires well-defined and common business architecture.  Effective organizations have a strategy to construct and leverage their global business service capabilities.

»      Aligning Processes and Technology – Providing best practice back office services requires vision, agility, and coordination across multiple functions.  It requires a focus on the provision of solutions, not technology.

So what are you waiting for?  

Click here to download your freemium copy by visiting our research site

Leave a comment

Satisfying customers’ needs profitably: can marketing BPO revive marketeers?

Back in the ’80s, every college kid that wasn’t a computer geek wanted to be a marketeer.  It’s definition was simply “Satisfying customers’ needs and wants profitably”.  

Check out our new Marketing BPO report... just click here

The three top dogs in the enterprise in those days were often the CEO, the CFO… and the CMO.  That ’80s CMO had to to understand the company strategy and have in-depth knowledge of the value of the products and services, while communicating that value to customers.  Not only that, he/she had to have detailed knowledge of who their prospective customers were and figure out how to reach them, while convincing the world they had a more desirable offering than the competition.  Simply put, the top CMOs were the strategists, the analysts, the go-to-market tacticians and the entrepreneurs all rolled into one super-executive.

Somehow, this function lost much of its strategic relevance over the next couple of decades, becoming a morass of (often dysfunctional) processes, data and workflows, with the CMO becoming an increasingly tactical executive, providing fodder for the sales team.  Conversely, the cost and importance of marketing has risen as the effectiveness has fallen away.  Sound familiar?

So!  Like any function in need of a facelift, a cost-gouge and some “transformation”, let’s consider outsourcing parts of it… so without further ado, let’s shift over to HfS Research’s exocet BPO analyst, Reetika Joshi, to discuss her new report “Marketing BPO Services: Solving the CMO’s Dilemma”, which you can download for limited time at our BPO Resource Center

CMOs have it tough today, whichever geography or market you look at. They’re stretching dollars for myriad activities in a function that’s undergoing major change. The slow recovery from the recent credit crunch has only made the job tougher for marketers. Rising pressure on company profits has increased the need for companies to renew focus on issues such as pricing strategies, customer buying behavior, campaign management, and customer engagement. Read More »

2 Comments

Why outsourcing professionals must stay in touch with the 99%

Like everyone else, I am disturbed by the economic and social instability in which our world currently finds itself.  While the 2008 crash saw us all face a major economic and fiscal reality-check, 2012′s landscape will see us move beyond bailouts and credit downgrades to a world where governments and business leaders need to deal with the societal impact of growing unemployment, worker insecurity and an alarmingly widening gap between the wealthy establishment and the common workers (or, as the Americans love to call them, “the Middle Class”).

We’re already starting to see visible signs of social unrest developing with the “Occupy” demonstrations spreading across the western world. Worryingly, for business leaders and governments, is the fact that there is no imminent prospect of these movements fizzling out. A Double-Dip Recession will exacerbate these issues further and we could be on the cusp of some dramatic and painful changes to the global economic and political landscape.

As we stumble towards this increasing likelihood of a Double-Dip Recession, these are becoming highly sensitive times for our enterprises, and none more so for the buyers, advisors and sellers of outsourcing services operating right in the midst of many of these issues. So what are their expectations, and how do they anticipate their respective businesses to be impacted if things take a nose-dive?

Providers and Advisors are bullish about profiting from a Double-Dip, but must avoid complacency

Our new study that covered the intentions and observations of 534 buyers, advisors and providers with their sourcing strategies, in the event of a “Double-Dip” Recession, reveals that the folks advising and selling outsourcing services are feeling pretty bullish that their clients will turn to them for even more help, if things really start to get dicey over the next six months.  61% of provider and 44% of advisor executives are expecting their respective businesses to increase revenues:

While the sell-side readies itself to enjoy increased profits, close to half of enterprises are expecting layoffs, 40% are sizing up increasing the labor-arbitrage of IT and 30% similarly with finance, procurement, industry-specific and customer management processes:

Business leaders, like political leaders, must not lose touch with their employees during these difficult times – especially over issues such as outsourcing

While most of us are incredibly frustrated with Greek PM Papandreou’s decision to turn to his people for their opinion, let’s pause for a moment – if your government had mismanaged your economy so badly that you were going to be indebted to the Germans and the Chinese for the next few decades, wouldn’t you be feeling a bit miffed?  If your CEO was about to sell a major shareholding in your firm to some other entity, and you were a stakeholder in the business, wouldn’t you want a say?  If your company’s board had mismanaged its finances so badly, it feels the need to outsource a whole chunk of its operations to some provider who barely understands the intricacies of your company, wouldn’t you want a say?

Surely, lousy management teams run the risk of ripping the very soul out their corporate cultures if they fail to listen to the concerns and recommendations of their people, just like those awful governments who drove their nations to bankruptcy and think they can still fix their problems with even more bailouts and loans, without consulting their people?  Do corporate leaders want their workforces to feel like the “99%”?  I don’t think so…

And is the 99% really so ignorant about what’s going on that both governments and their business leaders can now operate in a bubble of their own because they know better?  Something’s gotten broken here, and it may simply be that many of today’s politicians and business leaders are actually losing touch with their people. This is an alarming and unsustainable trend, and the outsourcing business could be in danger of getting caught up in the complacency.

While news like this will have some advisors and providers excited about hitting their revenue goals, we have to be highly-conscious of the fact that if this data becomes reality, the outsourcing industry is going to arrive at a highly visible and dangerous phase in its development. As we have been at pains to point out – for five years on this site – buyers need to look beyond labor-arbitrage to find any real long-term benefits from outsourcing. However, these issues are going to move beyond buyers simply improving business processes and cutting costs – they are going to become  centered on how companies are managing their workforces. Governments are very capable of passing measures very quickly to restrict outsourcing if things get really bad – and they won’t have much choice if the 99% demand it.

The Bottom-line: Outsourcing professionals need to avoid being perceived as the “1%”

Now, more than ever, the outsourcing industry runs the risk of a backlash, if the worst economic fears are realized in the coming weeks and months.  A Double-Dip Recession will polarize governments and most likely paralyze uncertain businesses.  Most of you who frequent our blog and research sites make a decent living buying, advising or selling sourcing – and we have a collective responsibility to recognize that the very life-blood of organizations and their employees are at stake in the coming months. And if they fail, we will go down with them.

Outsourcing can be a tremendous help for many organizations needing support with improving their processes, globalizing their business operations and accessing better IT, but it is not – and never should be – the only solution to their problems.  It should be a vehicle to help companies perform better, to help its staff become more experienced and knowledgeable.  All outsourcing stakeholders – buyers, providers and advisors – need to focus, more than ever, on helping organizations approach outsourcing as one supporting component of a holistic solution.  In short, buyers and providers need to come closer together to tackle these issues and demonstrate to the world how they are creating value and improving competitive behavior.

We need to demonstrate how making organizations smarter helps create jobs and drive growth – not how making them smaller makes the 1% that little bit richer…

11 Comments

A big cat for a big job: meet Tiger (Part III)

And now we bring you the long-awaited final installment of our recent discussion with Genpact’s new President and CEO, NV “Tiger” Tyagarajan.  

NV "Tiger" Tyagarajan is the new President and CEO, Genpact (click for bio)

In Part I, we asked Tiger about his background and how he’s going to be a little different from his predecessor, Pramod Bhasin; Part II focused on Tiger’s immediate and long-term plans for Genpact; And finally, Part III delves into Tiger’s vision for the future of technology and BPO.  So, without any further ado, let’s circle back to the eye of the Genpact…

Phil Fersht (HfS Research): Tiger, There’s been a lot of talk about business platforms and bringing together clusters of standard processes, putting them in the cloud, etc. Do you feel the industry’s really moving that way, or do you think it’s a bit of a mixed bag?

NV “Tiger” Tyagarajan (Genpact):  I think it’s a mixed bag. Some global companies have deliberately set up independent businesses to enable a “clean sheet of paper” approach. Within that are questions including, “Can we put everything on the cloud?” “Can we wrap services onto a platform and make it standard?” “Can we all buy in to a standard without fighting like cats and dogs about ‘my process’ and ‘your process’”? Here it all boils down to, are we willing to accept a standard even though different people have opposing views?

The second situation is when large corporations are almost forced to venture into emerging markets, e.g., India, China or Brazil, in search of growth. In this scenario, they don’t have to worry about legacy processes and technology, which are expensive and time consuming. And with speed-to-market being so important, they believe they may as well hit the market running without having to invest in technology, instead investing in the cloud for just about everything.

The third scenario is for bespoke solutions for standalone requirements wherein organizations opt to buy, for example, a front-end sales force management tool on the cloud (e.g., Salesforce.com). But the reality is that most of this stuff is typically never integrated into the financial systems of the company, which actually makes it easy to say “I’m buying it.”

Then there are the mid-market companies that are growing rapidly, sometimes at a rate of 25-30 percent. For them, legacy systems don’t matter, because in three years their business will only be half legacy and within five years, it will have gone beyond that.

Similarly, emerging market companies are easily willing to leap frog onto the cloud because of their up to 40 percent growth rate. And for them, as legacy is pretty archaic, their willingness to jump to the cloud is really high.

Let me switch for a second to large corporations and their legacy platforms. We are finding that to be as tough as it was before. The fact is, if I walk into a global pharmaceutical company, even today its 100 (or however many) countries fight with each other on what is the right payables process for them. They are unwilling to sign on to a standard. So, I would argue, if they aren’t willing to sign onto a standard among themselves, the day of signing onto a standard that is a public cloud is far, far away. But I think if they agree to a standard among themselves, at least they can get on to a private cloud, which would be very beneficial.

But I still see that being quite some time away. There’s not enough push happening, primarily because there’s so much legacy and cost sitting out there, plus entrenched decision-making and vested interests. People worry about what’s going to happen to their job if processes go to the cloud. So, I think there’s a little more hype than reality about everything going to the cloud, except in the cases I already talked about where we’re seeing movement.

Phil:  My concern is that you see some of the providers persist in selling in the same myopic way they were three or four years ago, and today’s more sophisticated buyers are saying, “We know there’s cost reduction on the table. We really want to get to what you can do for us beyond that, and how can we trust you?” And if all providers are offering essentially the same thing, how does a provider differentiate itself? Is it ownership of the technology or distinctiveness of domain acumen? I think that’s the holy grail right now, and I’d love to hear your thoughts on this… Read More »

1 Comment

Double-Dip Dynamics, Part II: The new tenets of outsourcing – process standardization, global flexibility and better technology

For the very first time in my 16-year career, the major driver behind outsourcing is no longer immediate cost reduction. Hallelujah. Praise the Lord.

In the vast majority of cases, sourcing buyers have already enjoyed a fair amount of cost-reduction in recent years with their outsourcing initiatives, so they already expect the basic financials to work for many of the new endeavors they are exploring… hence, attention moves to other business benefits that outsourcing can deliver.

Moreover, most enterprises today that are experienced with outsourcing have already offloaded many of the conspicuous costs with predominantly labor-based engagements, in areas such as software maintenance support, development and testing, and transactional accounting.  Their attention is now moving to other (and often more complex) processes and technology areas where they need to dig out real improvements, and outsourcing can potentially provide that trigger.

In days gone by, the old adage about outsourcing that many executives would often declare (off-the-record) has been “let’s take 30%+ off the bottom-line and if we can make some other business improvements with the exercise that’s a bonus, but let’s get the costs out.”  Today, they’re saying, “OK, we know where the cost-savings are with outsourcing, now let’s use the experience to get better process and technology for our business”.

The impetus has changed – and while many outsourcing engagements, in the past, have largely fallen flat with delivering business benefits beyond cost-elimination, clearly many executives are getting more experienced and skilled at driving sourcing initiatives, and are confident they can use the endeavor as a change agent to promote and implement much-needed improvements to their business operations.

Our new study that covered the intentions and observations of 534 buyers, advisors and providers with their sourcing strategies, in the event of a “Double-Dip” Recession, reveals what is motivating buyers to outsource in this current climate, and while eliminating cost is still is a core fundamental, buyers are even more focused on achieving greater flexibility to scale their global operations as a prime motivating factor: Read More »

12 Comments

It’s Meg Mitt-man as HP does a 180 with its Band-Aid plan

Health plans, PCs... who cares?

Did HP recruit the right Republican? With the 180-degree strategy flip over the “sale” of its PC division, shouldn’t HP have hired the master of the 180 himself? And is there a difference between “keep” and “couldn’t sell”?

One can ask many questions as to why HP’s new CEO made such a dramatic reversal of Léo Apotheker’s decision barely two months’ ago. There’s nothing wrong with making “180′s” with product and strategy decisions – the very best businesses in the world have been quick to admit bad decisions and correct them. Even the great Steve Jobs made some 180′s in his career… but none of them in barely 2 months.

However, I believe the answer is very simple:  HP’s board has had a deep look into its very soul, and had a very scary premonition of where it was headed. It saw its future existence without its heritage hardware businesses, becoming predominantly an enterprise IT services organization with a curious software acquisition.  Yes, it was running the risk of morphing into a me-too to IBM. IBM has just appointed a laser-focused services leader in Ginny Rommety to take them forward as a services mammoth. Enterprise services is IBM’s DNA. HP has hired a politician and Internet auctioneer entrepreneur. Hmm…

Did Meg make the right call to keep PCs?  Yes – she probably did for three reasons:

1) No-one wanted to buy the division;

2) HP’s board never really wanted to sell it;

3) HP’s board was feeling naked and exposed at the prospect of rebuilding the firm without it.

The jury’s out over whether Meg will turn around a famous company which is now struggling to save its tarnished brand.  It’s an immense challenge and will take several months to see any real progress, but reclaiming part of its very soul – making personal computers – will help it rebuild its identity.

4 Comments

Double-Dip Dynamics, Part I: 70% of buyers are sitting on the fence with their outsourcing plans in the current climate

Innovation? Value? Hmmm... I'll stick to chestnuts

While outsourcing clearly provides a vehicle to help under-pressure business leaders coerce some of the change they need to embrace in today’s uncertain economy, most do not view it as the only lever to pull to achieve their goals. The majority of today’s buyers are still trying to figure out what sourcing levers they have at their disposal, uncertain as to the right approach for their organizations.

Our new study that covered the intentions and observations of 534 buyers, advisors and providers with their sourcing strategies, in the event of a “Double-Dip” Recession, reveals one major shift in the industry:  most buyers now recognize what their businesses need to improve to drive productivity, they simply are struggling to figure out how to marshall their internal and external resources to help them get there.  And a rocky economy isn’t helping drive definitive behavior, with seven-out-of-ten buyers expecting either little change in focus when it comes to outsourcing, or they simply do not know what they are going to do:

* Unlike the 2008 crash, which drove shock and awe into the boardrooms of every business, shouldn’t 2011′s threat of economic adversity be precipitating a calmer, more organized approach to business planning?

* While experiences of 2008 have provided an expectation that further catastrophe is just around around the corner, shouldn’t buyers be far more assertive with planning new measures to contain costs and find new areas for productivity and growth?

The Bottom-line: Buyers are looking more broadly than simply outsourcing to drive productivity improvements in today’s climate

Indeed, today’s harsh business realities are driving more focus on organizations aligning both their outsourcing and shared services frameworks (click here to download a copy of our Global Business Services paper), however, are companies panicking and screaming: ”Help! We must hurl as many of our fixed administrative costs out of the window asap and deploy as much low-cost service delivery as we can, regardless of the consequences”?  Of course they aren’t – they’re also looking at measures such as their ability to have more flexible global operations, to standardize processes across geographies and ERP instances and to align their internal stakeholders more effectively. Cost-control is a measure that is always a constant focus, however outsourcing doesn’t always provide that answer, especially with experienced businesses that have already moved out a lot of tangible cost in areas such as transactional accounting and application support.  Outsourcing only provides part of the answer.

As we recently discussed, business leaders are beset by multiple business pressures in today’s climate, and outsourcing provides just one lever among many that they can choose to pull. Only 13% of buyers are concerned about the disruption caused by outsourcing, hence if they currently only view outsourcing as a cost-reduction lever, they are going to place it in a pecking order of other cost-reduction measures… and it’s not always going to the most effective short-term measure in a tough economy. It’s the job of advisors and providers to educate and demonstrate to buyers the benefits beyond cost-reduction and help clients embed outsourcing among their internal governance practices to align its benefits with those provided by internal process improvement and shared services.

We’ll reveal all in Part II coming shortly to an HfS website near you…

1 Comment

HfS is awarded IIAR Analyst of the Year for second year in succession

HfS Research is the Analyst Firm of the Year for Outsourcing, while Phil Fersht scoops Analyst of the Year

For some reason, people keep insisting on giving us accolades for being cranky, irritable and disruptive influences on the services industry.  

However, the awards we received today (see link here) are an unbelievable validation of our team’s hard work from the International Institute of Analyst Relations (IIAR) – and proof that we’re not just a “flash in the pan” in the industry analyst business.  IIAR’s awards are widely recognized as the foremost accolades in the analyst profession, with such a large number of analyst-facing professionals providing the votes.

Today, HfS Research won the individual award for “Analyst of the Year” for a second year in succession (some individual called Phil Fersht now sporting an ego so insufferable, it’s rumored he can’t even stand his own company).

In addition to the individual analyst award, HfS Research topped the charts for “Outsourcing, BPO and Maintenance Analyst Firm of the Year“.

And this time, HfS Research was a runner-up for the overall “Analyst Firm of the Year”, behind the formidable Gartner.  Over 260 analyst and influencer relations specialists took part in this year’s survey – by far the greatest number to date, who voted on all the major research analyst organizations, such as IDC, Forrester, Ovum and so forth.  According to some of the participants’ entries, success factors included, “intelligent people with common sense”, “Research that is always compelling to read – and our clients like it” said another. One participant went further saying of HfS, “They are the heartbeat in the world of outsourcing and shared services”.  My word – has the world gone mad?  We’re just a poky 14-analyst set-up where we still re-use our teabags in the morning and have to share two Men’s Wearhouse suits for client meetings (we got the second one free…).

When we won the prestigious IIAR “Analyst of the Year” award last year, it was great to get some recognition for our hard work, but many people sniggered behind our backs that we would fade away pretty quickly.  However, to retain that award this year, and also win the runner-up for “Analyst firm of the Year” is a validation that HfS Research is about to enter its third year in operation, with a strong mandate from industry that people are getting some value from our research, love our accessible model and the fact we can provide real data on industry dynamics practically as the happen.

Anyhow, we would like to offer anyone who voted for us a cocktail on us when you see us at some upcoming conference, which we will be able to pay for out of the 20% price hike we’re gonna add to our services.

Thanks again – we really appreciate all the wonderful support, accolades and banter as we rumble into a third year of operations.

21 Comments

A big cat for a big job: meet Tiger (Part II)

In Part I we gave you a little background into Tiger’s rise to prominence and how he’s going to behave a little differently from Pramod.  Now let’s delve into the Genpact-specific opportunities and challenges that Tiger will be tackling in his new role as President and CEO. So, without further ado, here’s Part II…

Phil Fersht (HfS Research):  Tiger, there’s been a lot of talk lately about the value that Indian companies can bring to U.S. and European firms. People are saying, “These Indian companies are great at training people, have good talent development and succession planning programs and so forth – they bring a lot to the table.” What’s your view? What do you think that Indian firms can bring to U.S. and European companies, and maybe vice versa?

NV “Tiger” Tyagarajan (Genpact): Firms, including us, Cognizant, Infosys and TCS, have all grown at 20 percent plus for many years now. And one of the things that’s gotten us there is a pretty significant hiring, training and culturalization engine that allows us to have one culture across the company in most cases. But we’ve clearly realized that many of our global clients don’t have one culture. It’s actually very fragmented, and the different countries don’t really work well together.

NV "Tiger" Tyagarajan is the new President and CEO, Genpact (click for bio)

So actually, when people talk about innovation in the industry and wonder where it is, I push back and say that the HR and training practices and models in provider companies is truly innovative. In fact, many of our clients turn to us and ask, “Can we take this practice and that practice of yours, and embed them in our organization? Can you teach us how to do it? Can you give us the same tools, methodologies?”

In Genpact’s case, our singular, enterprise-wide culture is very similar to that of GE. Irrespective of what GE office in the world you walk into – whether it’s Canton, Ohio, New York, India, Shanghai or Tokyo –within five minutes you realize you’re in a GE office. The language used is the same. And while each country of course has its own culture, there’s the overarching, action-oriented, boundary-less, performance-driven culture. And global corporations need a culture that cuts across all nations and to some extent supersedes national culture.

I think one of the other things U.S. and European companies can learn from Indian firms is the concept of jugaad, which is an improvisational style of innovation that’s driven by scarce resources and attention to a customer’s immediate needs. In India, nothing is big enough to dedicate a single person, so people get involved in many things and end up being kind of a mixture of many things with knowledge that cuts across a broad spectrum. And because of the environment in India, people have simply learned to find a way to solve a problem, find an answer, in spite of multiple obstacles.

Phil:  One of characteristics that makes Genpact stand apart from many of its competitors, is the passion and motivation that’s to apparent in its staff. How do you keep people passionate? Is there a secret to that, or do you think it’s just something very cultural within an organization?

Tiger:   Phil, I’m so glad you asked me that, because it’s my one “keeps me awake at night” thing. I do wonder about how to maintain the company’s culture as we keep growing and spreading your wings.

And we are becoming very global. Our growth rate outside of India is faster than in India by a factor of 50 percent, so very quickly we’ll reach a 50/50 split of staff. So, as that happens, and as I continue to shift my leadership team to the markets, which is another big statement I’ve made and I’m making my shift myself, how do you maintain the culture? Read More »

3 Comments