{"id":4558,"date":"2008-01-22T20:12:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-22T20:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/projects\/horsesforsources\/why-were-seeing-virtually-no-consolidation-among-large-outsourcing-suppliers\/"},"modified":"2008-01-22T20:12:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-22T20:12:00","slug":"why-were-seeing-virtually-no-consolidation-among-large-outsourcing-suppliers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.horsesforsources.com\/why-were-seeing-virtually-no-consolidation-among-large-outsourcing-suppliers\/","title":{"rendered":"Why we’re seeing virtually no consolidation among large outsourcing suppliers"},"content":{"rendered":"
I found myself embroiled in a debate with a colleague today, who covers software markets. 2008 promises to be a year of unprecedented consolidation in many niche software markets… because supply usually outstrips demand in new innovative areas (where software products tends to live), software products often complement each other, and software companies like to buy each other to hoover up more clients. Software is an acquisitive <\/em>industry, which is so well highlighted over at the Human Capitalist<\/a> with the example of HCM vendor Workstream <\/a>hawking itself around potential suitors. (I know several software entrepreneurs who spend all their time trying to find someone to buy them out…. that’s their end-game).<\/p>\n