increasing<\/em> costs. \u00a0So how – pray tell – can enterprises improve their talent without going through the considerable expense of hiring new people and training their\u00a0existing\u00a0staff? \u00a0The answer is simple: find someone else to help you do it – and good luck with it!<\/p>\nOf course, better workflow and process, better quality and innovation are vital ingredients to achieve greater productivity and increased revenues, but you have to start with the most critical ingredient: \u00a0your talent.<\/p>\n
If the industry known as outsourcing can prove consistently over time it can improve clients’ access to talent and new capabilities without increasing costs, then we won’t call it “outsourcing” any more, we’ll just call it “IT”, or “Finance”, or “Insurance” (and so on) services. \u00a0However, when the central component of the industry is to swap out local staff with foreign staff, the first question the general public (92% of whom – in the US – are actually employees) will ask is “Can these people do IT, finance or insurance better<\/em> than we can”.<\/p>\nFortunately, HfS has been able to reach out to close to 700 key stakeholders in the industry, 215 of whom are from\u00a0predominantly\u00a0large-sized US corporations, where we were able to ask them how they rated the\u00a0attributes\u00a0of their local talent to the overseas talent being provided by their service provider:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Where outsourcing is performing well<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\nIn terms of work ethic, process competency and overall value for money, service providers’ non-US staff are matching the local staff. \u00a0If these staff are 30-50% cheaper, that’s a pretty good return on your investment if that’s all you really care about.<\/p>\n
Where outsourcing needs to close the gaps<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\nIn terms of business understanding, initiative, innovation and culture, the non-US staff being provisioned are miles behind local staff. \u00a0For example, only 43% of buyers feel their non-US staff understands their business<\/em>, when compared to 88% of local staff. \u00a0Yes, this gap will surely close as the industry matures, but I find this talent-chasm unacceptable in today’s global marketplace.<\/p>\nThe Final Word: Service providers need to improve their talent mix and use more local talent, however, buyers need to demand it<\/span><\/p>\nOutsourcing has earned a largely crappy\u00a0reputation\u00a0because it’s become so focused on providing rules-based models that can enable offshore staff to get the job done. \u00a0Many clients, for whatever reason, have been convinced they can do this with 90% of their delivery staff sitting offshore, or some simply didn’t care and wanted to make the numbers work.<\/p>\n
However, our research clearly tells us that most clients care passionately<\/em> about innovation and process improvement, so why are we persisting with these\u00a0imbalanced\u00a0delivery models, where the outcomes are performing miles from what we want to be? \u00a0Why aren’t today’s buyers training their own staff to manage their global resources more effectively, so that more of them do<\/em> understand their businesses? \u00a0Why are service providers so insistent on sending offshore managers onto their clients’ sites to manage their own staff, when they should be training their clients to be more self-sufficient?<\/p>\nI believe this industry has become skewed – too much work has been shifted to offshore locations, when their needs to be greater investment in improving local talent. \u00a0Providers need to be more global with their focus and provide more balanced location options for their clients, even though clients will have to pay more for it. \u00a0A more balanced onshore\/offshore mix will lead to better development of offshore personnel and help bridge the current talent-chasm that is plaguing today’s outsourcing industry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rarely has a debate aroused so many emotions, yet failed to reach any conclusions, which was precisely what transpired when…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,63,70,78,80,81,832,830,97,837],"tags":[303],"ppma_author":[19],"yoast_head":"\n
The great outsourcing talent-chasm: 57% of service provider staff don't understand their clients' businesses - Horses for Sources | No Boundaries<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n